EICHORCondition: Prostate Cancer · Prostate Adenocarcinoma · Sponsor: I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
The aim of this study is to compare clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate by the 4 biopsy methods: TRUS-guided, cognitive, fusion and transperineal template mapping biopsy. It is recommended to combine MRI-guided biopsy with systematic (TRUS-guided or transperineal template mapping biopsy) biopsy for high yield of prostate cancer diagnosis. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which biopsy combination is more precise for prostate cancer detection.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
No contact information is available for this study as per the public registry record.
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University. | Moscow, Russia | — |
Save your interest here for when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Email alerts for this study aren't switched on yet.
We keep this only about this public record, and never email you without alerts being switched on. Want it removed at any time? Email hello@eichor.com. Never medical advice. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05589558