EichorEICHOR
Study identifier: NCT04349657 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · August 06, 2026
● Study status: Active Not Recruiting

A Study Evaluating the Endovascular Treatment of Subjects With Stenotic or Restenotic Lesions of the Common Femoral Artery With the Supera Vascular Mimetic Implant Compared to Surgical Common Femoral Artery Endarterectomy

Condition: Peripheral Arterial Disease  ·  Sponsor: KANDO Research

PhaseNA
Planned participants286
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The SUPERSURG RCT trial investigates the efficacy and safety of the endovascular treatment of stenosis or restenosis in the common femoral artery (CFA) of patients presenting with Rutherford classification 2,3 or 4 with a Supera Vascular Mimetic Implant of Abbott, compared to classic surgical common femoral artery endarterectomy. The Supera Vascular Mimetic Implant has an interwoven design and has a high crush resistance and is, when correctly implanted, an ideal stent to treat eccentric calcified plaques in the CFA. An expected total of 143 patients will be treated with the Vascular Mimetic Implant of Abbott and compared to a control group of another 143 patients that will be treated with classic surgical endarterectomy of the common femoral artery. Assignment to the treatment groups will be at random. Patients will be invited for a follow-up visit at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as follows: freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization and binary restenosis at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint is defined as follows: a composite of overall death, cardiac, pulmonary, renal complications, sepsis, target lesion revascularisation and wound related complications through 30 days post-index procedure. The secondary endpoints are defined as technical success, primary patency in the deep femoral artery, primary patency in the target lesion, target lesion revascularisation, target vessel revascularisation…

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

No contact information is available for this study as per the public registry record.

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (13)

O.L.V. HospitalAalst, Belgium
Imelda HospitalBonheiden, Belgium
A.Z. Sint-BlasiusDendermonde, Belgium
Z.O.L.Genk, Belgium
Az GroeningeKortrijk, Belgium
AZ Sint-MaartenMechelen, Belgium
A.Z. Jan PortaelsVilvoorde, Belgium
Maastricht UMC+Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Dijklander hospitalHoorn, North Holland, Netherlands
St Antonius HospitalUtrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Noordwest ziekenhuisgroepAlkmaar, Netherlands
Bonifraterskie Centrum MedyczneKrakow, Poland

+ 1 more locations — full list on the registry record.

Follow this study

Save your interest here for when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Email alerts for this study aren't switched on yet.

We keep this only about this public record, and never email you without alerts being switched on. Want it removed at any time? Email hello@eichor.com. Never medical advice. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →