Multi-Center Adolescent Clavicle Fracture Trial: Operative vs. Non-Operative Treatment

Investigators from eight tertiary care, level 1 pediatric trauma centers have developed a protocol for the establishment of a formal, prospective multi-center adolescent clavicle registry, with designs for standardized radiographic assessment and the prospective collection of validated outcome measures and complications data, for all patients, ages 10-18, treated for clavicle shaft fractures, operatively and non-operatively. Eventually, the investigators would like to do comparative analysis for the operative and non-operative treatment arms, with additional sub-stratified analyses performed within these treatment arms by age and activity level. Among the primary goals of research projects stemming from the first arm of this registry, FACTS A, is to explore the hypothesis that non-operative treatment is associated with lower costs, greater safety, and equivalent or superior outcomes, compared with operative treatment, despite a national trend towards increasing surgical treatment. The second arm of the registry, FACTS B, will continue to investigate the same hypotheses, excluding cost outcomes, in patients only with completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

No contact information is available for this study as per the public registry record.

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Save your interest here for when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Email alerts for this study aren't switched on yet.

We keep this only about this public record, and never email you without alerts being switched on. Want it removed at any time? Email hello@eichor.com. Never medical advice. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.