Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation and Standard Low-Power Ablation in Catheter Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and represents one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. According to current data, AF is associated with approximately 20% of all ischemic strokes, while the risk of stroke in patients with this arrhythmia is increased fivefold. Ischemic stroke in patients with AF is characterized by a more severe clinical course, more frequently results in death, is associated with significant disability, and carries a higher risk of recurrence compared with strokes of other etiologies. Consequently, the risk of death in patients with AF-associated stroke is doubled, while the economic costs of treatment increase by an average of 1.5 times. The aim of the present study is to perform a comparative evaluation of the efficacy of two interventional treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation: very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation (90 W) and conventional low-power radiofrequency ablation (35-45 W) for pulmonary vein isolation using the "CLOSE protocol" approach with a non-fluoroscopic navigation system. The efficacy of the interventions will be assessed both in the early postoperative period and during long-term follow-up over 12 months.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Andrey Filatov  ·  +7(495) 414-77-02  ·  agfilatov@bakulev.ru

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.