← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07656285 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Comparison of Immediate Changes in Cervical Range of Motion Following Cervical Extension and Downslip Mobilizations.

Condition: Cervical Disease  ·  Sponsor: Missouri State University

PhaseNA
Planned participants128
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteersYes

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy seated cervical extension glides vs supine downslip glides, on both cervical rotation range of motion and patient comfort. Information gathered from this study may be used to help clinicians determine the most beneficial methods of cervical mobilizations as a rehabilitation tool.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Kim Ennis, PT, ScD, OCS, FAAOMPT  ·  15176143690  ·  kwspartan10@gmail.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Missouri State University - Physical Therapy ClinicSpringfield, Missouri, United StatesRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07656285