Condition: Pulpitis · Sponsor: Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí
The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether buffered local anesthesia is more effective than conventional local anesthesia in reducing pain responses in school-aged children requiring dental treatment for pulpitis. The study will also assess differences in physiological and self-reported indicators of pain and anxiety, as well as anesthetic onset and duration. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does buffered local anesthesia reduce behavioral pain scores measured by the FLACC scale compared to conventional local anesthesia? Does buffered local anesthesia improve physiological and psychometric indicators of pain and anxiety during dental procedures? Methodology: The researchers will compare buffered local anesthesia with conventional local anesthesia during routine dental treatment procedures such as pulpotomy or pulpectomy in primary molars. Participants will: Receive either buffered or conventional local anesthesia during dental treatment Undergo pulpotomy or pulpectomy depending on clinical diagnosis Be monitored for pain and anxiety using FLACC scale, heart rate, skin conductance, and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale at different stages of treatment Have the onset and duration of anesthesia recorded during and after the procedure Be followed until recovery of soft tissue sensation after treatment
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Mayte A Condori Chambi, Cirujano Dentista · +524446641295 · maytecondori97@gmail.com
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí | San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, Mexico | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07638254