Condition: Uterine Prolapse · Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery · Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) · Sponsor: Tampere University Hospital
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Manchester procedure and vaginal hysterectomy in treating patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse. The main question it aims to answer is: • What is the difference in the success rates at the the two year follow-up Participants will: * be randomized in either the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy group and operated as such * visit the clinic at 2 and 5 years after the operation * fill in questionnaires at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after the operation
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Päivi K Karjalainen, MD, PhD · +358142695512 · paivi.karjalainen@hyvaks.fi
Anniina Karioja, MD · +358331165005 · anniina.karioja@pirha.fi
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Helsinki University Hospital | Helsinki, Finland | Recruiting |
| Hospital Nova, The Wellbeing Services County of Central Finland | Jyväskylä, Finland | Recruiting |
| Kuopio University Hospital | Kuopio, Finland | Recruiting |
| Oulu University Hospital | Oulu, Finland | Recruiting |
| Tampere University Hospital | Tampere, Finland | Recruiting |
| Turku University Hospital | Turku, Finland | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07566949