Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Bronchoscopy for Cryobiopsy in the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) often requires histopathological confirmation when high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings are inconclusive. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgical lung biopsy, but diagnostic yield remains variable and dependent on biopsy location and procedural precision. Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) combined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) may allow more precise navigation to target lung segments and potentially improve biopsy quality and diagnostic yield. This multi-center, investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial will compare conventional bronchoscopy with 2D fluoroscopy guidance versus robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with CBCT guidance for transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in patients undergoing diagnostic evaluation for suspected interstitial lung disease. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either conventional bronchoscopy or robotic-assisted bronchoscopy. In both groups, four cryobiopsies will be obtained from two lung lobes using a 1.7 mm cryoprobe (en-bloc removal for both study arms). The primary endpoint is the rate of definitive histological diagnosis as determined by a blinded multidisciplinary ILD board.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Thomas Gaisl, MD MPH PhD  ·  +41762318339  ·  thomas.gaisl@uzh.ch

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.