Comparative Analysis of fast-and Slow-absorbable Poly(Lactose-co-glycolide) Sutures in Oral Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study aims to compare slow-resorbing and fast-resorbing sutures used after the surgical extraction of lower third molars. Sutures are routinely placed after wisdom tooth removal to promote hemostasis. Slow-resorbing and fast-resorbing sutures differ mainly in how long they remain in place, and fast-resorbing sutures often do not require removal. The study evaluates whether these two types of sutures differ in terms of microbiological contamination. Patient-reported inflammation, swelling, and postoperative discomfort will also be assessed. Each participant will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two suture types. Only routine clinical procedures are involved. Participation includes several standard visits: initial medical and dental history collection with oral and radiographic examination; the surgical extraction of the lower third molar; suture removal at 7 days. No additional invasive procedures are required. Participants will receive a daily diary to record pain levels and any pain medication taken during the first postoperative week. At the 7-day visit, wound healing will be evaluated and sutures will be removed, collected and anonymously analyzed by the University Microbiology Laboratory. This study seeks to provide useful information about the clinical performance and microbiological behavior of different types of resorbable sutures commonly used in oral surgery, with the goal of improving patient care and postoperative outcomes.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Stefano Sivolella, DDS  ·  049 821 8669  ·  stefano.sivolella@unipd.it

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.