← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07467954 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG and Fractional CO₂ Laser in Skin Rejuvenation

Condition: Skin Rejuvenation · Laser  ·  Sponsor: Universitas Padjadjaran

PhaseNA
Planned participants15
Who can joinAll sexes, 30 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteersYes

About this study

Skin rejuvenation is an effort to improve skin condition from the signs of skin aging. Skin aging is a complex biological process influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, leading to changes in the epidermis and dermis, including decreased collagen characterized by dermal thinning, as well as alterations in skin appearance such as laxity and wrinkles. Laser therapy is one of the treatment modalities for skin rejuvenation, aiming to induce neocollagenesis and collagen remodeling, resulting in dermal thickening and improvement in skin appearance. Fractional CO₂ laser is an ablative laser considered the gold standard therapy for skin rejuvenation, whereas Long Pulsed (LP) Nd:YAG 1064 nm is a nonablative laser that is also used for skin rejuvenation. To date, there have been no studies evaluating the comparative effectiveness between fractional CO₂ laser and LP Nd:YAG 1064 nm for skin rejuvenation. Therefore, research comparing the effectiveness of fractional CO₂ laser and LP Nd:YAG 1064 nm for skin rejuvenation is needed, assessed based on dermal thickness, skin elasticity, wrinkles, and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Ahmad R Ganiem, M.D., Ph.D  ·  +62 878 2288 3773  ·  rizalbdg@gmail.com

Kartika Ruchiatan, M.D.  ·  +62 811 247932  ·  kartika.ruchiatan@unpad.ac.id

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Hasan Sadikin General HospitalBandung, West Java, IndonesiaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07467954