Comparison of Wound Healing for Diabetic Carbuncle Treated With Incision and Drainage Technique Using Cruciate Incision vs Saucerization Technique Both Followed by Vacuum Assisted Closure.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two surgical techniques for wound healing in diabetic patients aged 25-70 years with a carbuncle requiring surgical drainage. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a difference in blood loss during surgery between the two techniques? Is there a difference in the duration required for wound healing between the two techniques? Researchers will compare the Incision \& Drainage group to the Saucerization group (both followed by Vacuum Assisted Closure) to see which technique results in better outcomes. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical groups. Receive their assigned surgical procedure (either cruciate incision \& drainage or saucerization). Receive post-operative Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) therapy. Have their wounds assessed during follow-up visits every 14 days until healed.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Adnan Ali, MBBS  ·  +92 334 4323941  ·  heartheart5000@gmail.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.