← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07427108 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety

Condition: Peripheral Arterial Disease · Vascular Diseases  ·  Sponsor: Sohag University

PhaseNA
Planned participants32
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by: * Puncture success rate * Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Yohana F Fayez, MBBCh  ·  +201288374728  ·  yohana_farouz_post@med.sohag.edu.eg

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Sohag University HospitalSohag, EgyptRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07427108