← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07395778 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Nasojejunal Feeding Versus Oral Feeding Following Endoscopic Drainage of Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis

Condition: Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis · Acute Pancreatitis (AP) · Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage  ·  Sponsor: Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

PhaseNA
Planned participants50
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The goal of this randomized control trial is to assess whether nasojejunal feed is better than oral nutrition in patients who are undergoing endoscopic cystogastrostomy of walled off necrosis following acute pancreatitis. It will also try to answer, the incidence of infections and feed tolerance. The main question it tries to answer is 1. whether nasojejunl feed is better than oral feed in patients undergoing endoscopic cystogastrostomy in walled off necrosis following acute pancreatitis 2. How much infections they develop, whether they are able to tolerate the feed, weight gain and reintervention rates in each group

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Saurabh Kumar Singh  ·  +919560113930  ·  drsaurabhkrsingh@gmail.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)Chandigarh, IndiaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07395778