← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07359755 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Vaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Robotic-assisted Abdominal Mesh Surgery in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse - Prospective Randomized Non-inferiority Study

Condition: Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) · Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery · Mesh Reinforcement  ·  Sponsor: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

PhaseNA
Planned participants86
Who can joinFemale, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The goal of this study is to compare vaginal mesh surgery with abdominal robotic-assisted mesh surgery for the treatment of genital prolapse in women. The main questions it seeks to answer are: * Is the objective cure rate for vaginal mesh surgery non-inferior to that of the abdominal approach? * Is the use of vaginal mesh as safe as abdominal mesh?

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Marcelo Hisano, MD PhD  ·  551126618080  ·  m.hisano@hc.fm.usp.br

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Sao PauloSão Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07359755