Condition: Diabetes · Sponsor: Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University
Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease that is widely prevalent globally, with its incidence rate continuously increasing, posing significant challenges to patient health and public health systems. In China, the number of diabetes patients ranks first in the world, with an adult prevalence rate as high as 12.8%. The core of diabetes management is blood glucose control. However, traditional finger-prick blood testing methods are inconvenient and have low patient compliance. In recent years, non-invasive blood glucose detection technologies have become a research hotspot. Among them, optical methods, especially spectroscopy techniques, are considered to have the most application potential due to their non-invasive, convenient, and stable characteristics. Raman spectroscopy, as an important branch of spectroscopy, has advantages such as non-invasiveness and high specificity, and has been successfully applied to blood glucose detection in laboratory settings. However, its clinical application is still in the exploratory stage. Foreign research has validated its feasibility, and domestic research has also made certain progress, but overall, it is still in its infancy. This study aims to compare the consistency and accuracy of Raman spectroscopy non-invasive blood glucose detection with traditional finger-prick blood glucose detection by comparing the blood glucose values measured by the two methods at the same time point. Additionally, the study will assess the participants' sat…
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Yuanyuan Miao · +86 18815015576 · miaoyuanyuan1001@163.com
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Beijing Shijitan Hospital | Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China | Recruiting |
| Beijing Shijitan Hospital | Haidian, Beijing Municipality, China | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07311421