← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07283185 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Prospective Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of EUS vs MRCP for Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis

Condition: Choledocholithiasis  ·  Sponsor: Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

PhaseN/A
Planned participants200
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

MRCP and EUS are diagnostically equivalent in detecting CBD stones among patients with intermediate risk, as shown in a landmark RCT. However, MRI-based imaging is power-intensive, requiring large infrastructure and long scan durations. EUS, a less energy-consuming and portable procedure, has the added advantage of enabling same-session ERCP, reducing the need for repeat procedures.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Dr.Hardik Rughwani  ·  9426928600  ·  dr.hardikr@aighospitals.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

AIG HospitalsHyderabad, Telangana, IndiaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07283185