← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07261228 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

The Difference in Carbon Footprint Between Diagnostic Upper GI Endoscopy in Dyspeptic Patients Versus Therapeutic Upper GI Bleeding

Condition: Carbon Footprint in Upper GI Endoscopy · Dyspepsia · Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding  ·  Sponsor: King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

PhaseN/A
Planned participants75
Who can joinAll sexes, 20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the carbon footprint produced from diagnostic upper GI endoscopy in patients with dyspepsia and therapeutic upper GI endoscopy in patients with non-variceal upper GI bleeding. The main question it aims to answer is: • How much carbon footprint is generated from upper GI endoscopy Participants are already receiving diagnostic and therapeutic upper GI endoscopy as part of their regular medical care for dyspepsia and non-variceal upper GI bleeding, respectively. The carbon footprint generated from this treatment process is examined.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Ponthakorn Pichayanont, Doctor of Medicine  ·  66831237704  ·  ponthakorn.pi@gmail.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (2)

King Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalBangkok, ThailandRecruiting
Sawanpracharak HospitalNakhon Sawan, ThailandRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07261228