← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07250139 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Comparative Study of Ziplyft Treatment vs. Traditional Blepharoplasty for Upper Eyelid Rejuvenation

Condition: Dermatochalasis of Upper Eyelid · Ptosis, Eyelid · Blepharoplasty  ·  Sponsor: Osheru Inc.

PhaseNA
Planned participants50
Who can joinAll sexes, 35 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

This study will compare two surgery techniques used for upper eyelid (eyelift) surgery: traditional surgery and a newer method called Ziplyft (a non-powered, hand-held clamp). This study will use a "split-face" design, meaning one eyelid will be treated with the traditional surgery method and the other with Ziplyft, allowing a direct side-by-side comparison. The objectives of the study are to compare Ziplyft treatment vs. traditional surgery by evaluating bruising, wound closure and incision, surgery case time, and subject/surgeon surveys.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Patricia Buehler, MD  ·  541-419-4412  ·  pbuehler@osheru.com

Becky Weathers  ·  541-312-4622  ·  bweathers@osheru.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

New Century OphthalmologyOxford, North Carolina, United StatesRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07250139