Condition: Extraction Sites After Removal and Bone Replacement Grafting at Extraction Sockets of Dentally Hopeless Single-rooted Teeth · Sponsor: University of Alabama at Birmingham
This study will compare commercially available, commonly used mouth rinses (0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) vs. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)) for immediate post-operative and daily antiseptic use after tooth extraction and ridge preservation grafting followed by daily use of commercially available an essential oil (EO) mouthrinse and EDTA mouthrinse.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Maria L Geisinger, DDS, MS · 205-934-4984 · miagdds@uab.edu
Sarah Jane Startley, DMD · 205-975-8711 · ss1971@uab.edu
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham, Alabama, United States | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07191262