← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07184801 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidate vs. Midazolam for Procedural Sedation During Medical Thoracoscopy

Condition: Medical Thoracoscopy  ·  Sponsor: Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

PhasePhase 3
Planned participants56
Who can joinAll sexes, 12 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

Medical thoracoscopy can be performed under procedural sedation (conscious sedation) in most of the cases. Procedural sedation is a state where the patient lies comfortably without much movement, does not feel pain and has a dissociative state (separation of mind and body. In view of the existing literature, we hypothesize that use of dexmedetomidine for procedural sedation during medical thoracoscopy will improve the ease of performing the procedure, lower the consumption of rescue analgesics and risk of intra- and post-procedure complications, improve the yield, shorten the recovery period and reduce the post-procedure pain in comparison to midazolam. In this study we propose to show that procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine during medical thoracoscopy is more beneficial for both patient and the clinician in terms of yield and shorter procedure time in comparison with conventional midazolam-fentanyl combination.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Inderpaul S Sehgal, DM  ·  +91-1722756820  ·  inderpgi@outlook.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Bronchoscopy suiteChandigarh, Chandigarh, IndiaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07184801