Condition: Femoral Access Site Closure · Ambulation · Vascular Access Complication · Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Transradial access has become the standard for coronary procedures due to fewer vascular complications and shorter bed rest, yet transfemoral access remains essential for complex peripheral interventions requiring larger sheaths and stronger support. Vascular closure devices (VCDs), particularly suture-mediated devices such as ProGlide, have improved femoral access by reducing hemostasis time, ambulation delay, and patient discomfort. Although early ambulation after ProGlide closure has been reported, current practice varies widely, and the relationship between ambulation timing and vascular complications remains unclear. This trial aims to evaluate the effect of different ambulation times after ProGlide closure in transfemoral peripheral angiography or intervention, with the goal of identifying the optimal time to ambulation that balances safety and efficiency.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Hui Dong, MD · 86-010-88322385 · donghui666@sina.com
Xiongjing Jiang, MD · 86-010-88322387 · jiangxiongjing@163.com
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College | Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07179536