Condition: Breast Cancer - Female · Surgery of Breast Cancer · Sponsor: The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
This study is for patients with breast cancer and the objective is to compare patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) based on scar placement in patients undergoing standard breast-conserving surgery (sBCS). BCS has become the standard of care for eligible patients with breast cancer (current UK national BCS rate is 60%). Scar placement for sBCS can be divided into two groups: those directly over the cancer, or those in remote locations (e.g. around the nipple, near the armpit, the lower part of the breast, where the breast and the chest meet etc.) with the aim of hiding the scar in more visually acceptable locations on the breast. Multiple factors determine where the scar is placed such as aesthetics, other health conditions, location of the cancer, etc. However, it is currently unclear whether the location of scar placement for sBCS affects patient reported outcomes. The growing importance on breast cosmesis has led to more attention from clinicians and patients with regards to the selection of surgical incision placement for sBCS. By using a validated questionnaire (BREAST-Q), we wish to assess if there is any difference in PROMs based on scar placement (over the lesion vs. remote) in patients undergoing sBCS. It is anticipated that the study results will help champion and guide care for future breast cancer patients, as well as providing an insight into how patient satisfaction may vary between different sBCS approaches. This questionnaire study will include consecu…
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Sue M Dr Hartup, PhD, RGN · +44 0113 2068628 · s.hartup@nhs.net
Baek Mr Kim, FRCS, MD, MA · +44 0113 2068628 · b.kim@nhs.net
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| St James's University Hospital | Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07116642