● Recruiting

A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeries

Condition: Stones, Kidney · Ureter Stones · Sponsor: Yosseif elhousseiny ammar ahmed

PhaseNA

Planned participants80

Who can joinAll sexes, 14 Years to no upper limit

Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

A comparative study between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus Traditional Access sheath in RIRS : Randomized controlled trial .

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Yosseif Ammar, MBBCH · 201226912630 · yosefelhousseiny@gmail.com

Ahmed Yehia Abdelaziz Mohammed, Professor of urology · 201229793766 · mailto:dr_ahmedyehia81@yahoo.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Cairo university hospitals

Cairo, Egypt

Recruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07076589