Condition: Dental Caries (Diagnosis) · Diagnostic Imaging · Optical Imaging · Sponsor: Sawanya Prutthithaworn
The goal of this observational study is to compare the diagnostic performance of three detection methods for approximal carious lesions in primary molars among pediatric patients aged 4-10 years. The study focuses on children in three age groups: 4-6 years, 6-8 years, and 8-10 years. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Are the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) different across the three diagnostic techniques (bitewing radiography, near-infrared light transillumination, and their combination)? * Are these diagnostic parameters influenced by patient age? * Which technique yields the highest level of patient acceptance? Researchers will compare the three diagnostic approaches to determine whether age influences diagnostic performance and patient acceptance. Participants will: * Be examined using bitewing radiography and near-infrared light transillumination * Undergo tooth separation for 7 days using orthodontic elastic separators * Receive clinical examination of the target approximal surface * Be asked to rate their experience using the Simplified Facial Pain Scale (S-FPS)
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Sawanya Prutthithaworn, Ph.D. (Dental biomaterials) · +6622007821 · sawanya.pru@mahidol.ac.th
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University (Phayathai Campus) | Bangkok, Thailand | Not Yet Recruiting |
| Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University (Phayathai Campus) | Bangkok, Thailand | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07041164