← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07019636 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Direct Extubation Versus Extubation After a Spontaneous Breathing Trial in Patients at Low Risk of Extubation Failure

Condition: Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation, Extubation  ·  Sponsor: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

PhaseNA
Planned participants314
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

This randomized controlled open label trial aims at comparing a weaning strategy including a spontaneous breathing trial as a prerequisite for extubation to a weaning strategy without a spontaneous breathing trial (direct extubation) in patients with readiness to be weaned criteria and considered at low risk of extubation failure. The main endpoint will be the proportion of patients successfully extubated within the 24 hours after randomization as compared to extubation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Martin DRES, Pr  ·  01 42 16 77 97  ·  martin.dres@aphp.fr

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Hôpital Pitié SalpêtrièreParis, FranceRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07019636