← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT07005505 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Automatic Tube Compensation vs. Pressure Support Ventilation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials in Adults

Condition: Spontaneous Breathing Trial in ICU  ·  Sponsor: Rush University Medical Center

PhaseNA
Planned participants880
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

For patients requiring mechanical ventilation, spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are conducted to determine if it is safe to remove the breathing tube. There are multiple methods for conducting SBTs. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of 2 methods, pressure support ventilation (PSV) versus automatic tube compensation (ATC), on successful extubation for critically ill adult patients who received mechanical ventilation for over 24 hours.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Jie Li, PhD  ·  312-563-4643  ·  Jie_Li@rush.edu

Lauren Harnois, MSc  ·  Lauren_J_Harnois@rush.edu

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Rush University Medical CenterChicago, Illinois, United StatesRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07005505