← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06976320 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Deep Rectus Sheath Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Condition: Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic · Anesthesia · Postoperative Pain  ·  Sponsor: Istinye University

PhaseNA
Planned participants60
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

Postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be considerable. Regional techniques such as erector spinae plane (ESP) block or transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block may be suitable for patients at increased risk of postoperative pain. The deep rectus sheath block is a novel block which is a modified version of the conventional rectus sheath block. It was reported in a few case reports that, it may be used for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study is to investigate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of deep rectus sheath block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Taylan Sahin, M.D.  ·  +902129794000  ·  taylansah@hotmail.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Istinye University HospitalIstanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)Recruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06976320