← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06921174 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Classical Perineal Massage Therapy Versus the Use of an Intravaginal Device to Reduce Postpartum Perineal Pain

Condition: Pelvic Pain  ·  Sponsor: Instituto Sexológico Murciano

PhasePhase 2
Planned participants140
Who can joinFemale, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

GA34.01 postpartum, a randomized design with a parallel group structure will be applied, randomly assigning participants into two groups. The first group will receive the traditional perineal massage therapy, while the second group will use the intravaginal device "Crescendo 2." In this study, a pre- and post-intervention evaluation will be conducted, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) as the primary outcome measure and the Clinical Global Impression Scale as the secondary outcome measure.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Jesús Eugenio Dr. Rodríguez Martínez, Phd  ·  +34639238413  ·  jesuseugenio@isemu.es

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Instituto Sexológico MurcianoMurcia, Murcia, SpainRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06921174