← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06892496 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Patient-reported Outcomes of Donor Site Healing Using Different Palatal Protection Techniques

Condition: Mucosal Erosion · Gingival Recession  ·  Sponsor: Virginia Commonwealth University

PhaseNA
Planned participants56
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

This study has been initiated to evaluate the question, "What is the best way to protect the palate after a gum graft is removed?" The overall objective is to determine if there is a difference in PROMs of donor site healing using different palatal post-operative protection techniques.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Rafael Amorim Cavalcanti de Siqueira  ·  8046288377  ·  amorimcavalr@vcu.edu

Anamika Khosla  ·  8048284868  ·  khoslaar@vcu.edu

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmond, Virginia, United StatesRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06892496