← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06802419 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries

Condition: Continuous Adductor Canal Block · Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee · Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries  ·  Sponsor: Ain Shams University

PhaseNA
Planned participants70
Who can joinAll sexes, 21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

This study aims to evaluate the effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block only versus adding posterior knee block, known as the Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block with Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB) after arthroscopic knee surgeries.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Nada E Hussein, Master  ·  00201112449418  ·  Nadahussein@med.asu.edu.eg

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Ain Shams UniversityCairo, EgyptRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06802419