Condition: Adult Congenital Heart Disease · Sponsor: IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
The goal of this observational study is to compare two pre-operative methods, that is the Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA), an actual standard diagnostic method, with the Coronary Computer Tomography (CCT) to undestand if the only CCT is sufficent to confirm the presence of a significative coronary disease and so to identify possible lesions in the coronary ematic circle, for example: stenosis and narrowing of coronary vessels. This observational study included people who have a congenital heart desease with indication of cardiac surgery and, why this disease, who had already performed these two diagnostic methods and/or who will perform them. The main question it aims to answer is: Should we avoid performing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) before cardiac surgery in people who have congenital heart desease (ACHD patients)?
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Gabriele Egidy Assenza, MD · +39 051 2149072 · gabriele.egidyassenza@aosp.bo.it
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna | Bologna, Italy | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06775639