← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06756789 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Conventional Vs Tailored Limb Lengths in Laparoscopic Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass Surgery

Condition: Obesity · Metabolic Disease · Bariatric Surgery Candidate  ·  Sponsor: GEM Hospital & Research Center

PhaseNA
Planned participants40
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The study aims to investigate whether tailoring limb lengths based on the 1/3rd and 2/3rd concept improves clinical outcomes in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) surgery compared to conventional limb lengths. In this study, two groups were described, first group involves patients who will undergo Lap RYGB with conventional limb lengths of 75cms and 125cms, while the second group is given tailored limb lengths according to the total small bowel length. In the follow up period, Total percentage weight loss, improvement in BMI along with the remission of co-morbidities were also assessed.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Contact details are listed per location below or on the registry record.

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

GEM Hospital and Research CenterCoimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IndiaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06756789