← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06655168 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Orotracheal Intubation in Newborns: Videolaryngoscopy Vs Direct Laryngoscopy

Condition: The Time Taken for Successful Tracheal Intubation in Each Technique  ·  Sponsor: Tunis University

PhaseNA
Planned participants115
Who can joinAll sexes, 1 Minute to 30 Days
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group)

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

salma Aouadi, Hospital university assistant  ·  0021656652210  ·  salmaaouadi1@gmail.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Bechir Hamza hospitalTunis, Tunis Governorate, TunisiaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06655168