← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06650878 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Desarda Tissue Technique vs Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair

Condition: Inguinal Hernia Unilateral · Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care  ·  Sponsor: Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i Garraf

PhaseNA
Planned participants478
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

This study aims to evaluate whether a surgical technique (Desarda) is superior to the commonly used surgical technique (Lichtenstein) in inguinal hernia repair concerning the occurrence of postoperative complications. The Lichtenstein technique involves the use of a mesh, while the Desarda technique does not.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Javier Errando, MD  ·  +34938960025  ·  jerrando@csapg.cat

Noemi Casaponsa  ·  +34 938960025  ·  recerca@csapg.cat

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

CSAPGSant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, SpainRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06650878