Condition: Buccal Infiltration · Articaine · Anesthesia · Sponsor: Qassim University
This study compares the effectiveness of two different volumes of buccal infiltration of Articaine for the extraction of mandibular posterior teeth. One group receives buccal infiltration of 1.8 ml of 4% Articaine and the other group receives buccal infiltration of 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Muhammad Atif S Agwan · 966541651713 · m.abdulsaleem@qu.edu.sa
Abdul K Azad · 00966594914343 · a.azad@qu.edu.sa
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Qassim University | Buraidah, Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia | Not Yet Recruiting |
| College of Dentistry, Qassim University | Buraidah, Saudi Arabia | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06630819