← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06620328 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Versus Electrocautery Dilator for EUS-guided Biliary Drainage (MED-BD)

Condition: Biliary Obstruction  ·  Sponsor: National Taiwan University Hospital

PhaseNA
Planned participants64
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The purpose of this study is to investigate the likelihood of post-dilation bleeding using mechanical or electrocautery dilation. We hypothesized that the risk of bleeding is lower in the mechanical group.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Yu-Ting Kuo  ·  +886972652398  ·  sfstruck@gmail.com

Hung-Yao Lin  ·  +886972654673

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

National Taiwan University HospitalTaipei, TaiwanRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06620328