Condition: Osteoarthritis, Knee · Sponsor: Zagazig University
The goal of this study is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of CT-guided and fluoroscopic-guided genicular nerve ablation in reducing knee pain and improving function in adults diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis refractory to conservative treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does CT-guided genicular nerve ablation provide superior pain relief compared to fluoroscopic-guided genicular nerve ablation? * Is there a significant difference in functional improvement between the two techniques? Researchers will compare the outcomes between the CT-guided and fluoroscopic-guided groups to determine which method achieves better pain relief, functional enhancement, safety profile, and patient satisfaction. Participants will: * Undergo either CT-guided or fluoroscopic-guided genicular nerve ablation. * Attend scheduled follow-up visits to assess pain levels, knee function, and any adverse events. * Complete standardized questionnaires to provide feedback on pain relief, functional improvement, and overall satisfaction with the procedure.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Ahmed A Bessar, MD, PhD · +201000089595 · Ahmedawadbessar@gmail.com
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Zagazig University, Faculty of Medicine | Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06514703