Condition: Dental Occlusion · Sponsor: University of Copenhagen
The overall aim is to evaluate the patient-reported outcome and efficiency of replacing posterior teeth with implant-supported crowns compared to RDPs and no treatment. Sub-aims are to evaluate a new 3D-methods for registration of occlusion and to test two crown designs. Thus, the study design has three aims: * To analyze patient perception including OHRQoL, when missing posterior teeth are replaced with implant-supported crowns compared to removable dental prostheses (RDPs) or no replacement. * To develop and validate new 3D digital methods for assessing occlusal contacts between upper and lower jaw and to analyze the methods relation to masticatory ability and efficiency. * To compare the difference in biological technical outcomes between splinted and non-splinted implant-supported crowns over time.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Chahak Seth-Johansen, DDS · +4551410210 · chahak.seth@sund.ku.dk
Klaus Gotfredsen, DDS · +4535332934 · klg@sund.ku.dk
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences | Copenhagen, Denmark | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06463405