← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06443073 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

The Mere-measurement Effect of Patient-reported Outcomes

Condition: Measurement, Psychological Stress · Speech Disorders · Assessment, Self  ·  Sponsor: Medical University of Vienna

PhaseNA
Planned participants170
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersYes

About this study

The use of patient-reported outcome (PROs) have become increasingly commonplace across many healthcare settings over the past two decades. The value of PROs is now acknowledged by healthcare providers and patients alike. However, to date, little is known about the best practices for formulating PRO measures (PROMS), but even more specifically, the effect had on the responding patients as a result of item word choice, emotional valence, or frequency of use. That is, 1) does the positive or negative wording of items affect the patient's perspective on the latent variable, 2) is there a degree of subliminal influence or measurement effects on their behaviour resulting from exposure to PROs, and finally, 3) is such an effect amplified with repeated exposure?

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Preston Long, PhD  ·  +43 (0)1 40400-66100  ·  preston.long@meduniwien.ac.at

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Preston LongVienna, AustriaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06443073