← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06372119 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Letrozole-stimulated Cycle Strategy Versus Artificial Cycle Strategy (LETSACT)

Condition: Embryo Transfer · Irregular Menstruation · Letrozole  ·  Sponsor: Mỹ Đức Hospital

PhaseNA
Planned participants790
Who can joinFemale, 18 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteersYes

About this study

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the letrozole-stimulated cycle strategy versus the artificial cycle strategy for endometrial preparation in women with irregular menstrual cycles after one cycle of endometrial preparation. The primary question it aims to answer is: • Does the letrozole-stimulated cycle strategy for endometrial preparation result in a higher live birth rate compared to the artificial cycle strategy in women with irregular menstrual cycles after one cycle of endometrial preparation? Participants will undergo screening before endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer, following which they will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: LETS or AC. In the LETS group, investigators will prescribe letrozole 5 milligrams/day for 5 days to stimulate follicular development and micronized progesterone 800 milligrams/day for luteal phase support. In contrast, the AC group will receive oral estradiol valerate 6-12 milligrams/day and micronized progesterone 800 milligrams/day. Researchers will compare the LETS and AC groups to determine if there are differences in live birth rates.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Nam T Nguyen, MD.  ·  +84354120209  ·  bsnam.nt@myduchospital.vn

Vu NA Ho, MD.  ·  +84935843336  ·  bsvu.hna@myduchospital.vn

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (2)

My Duc HospitalHo Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamRecruiting
My Duc Phu Nhuan HospitalHo Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06372119