← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06273475 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Robot-Assisted Training Versus Standard Training in Ischemic Stroke

Condition: Stroke · Ischemic Stroke  ·  Sponsor: Odense University Hospital

PhaseNA
Planned participants40
Who can joinAll sexes, 18 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) nested in a prospective cohort, is to investigate the superior effect of late-phase robot-assisted versus standard training on motor function, physical function, fatigue, and quality of life in a moderately-to-severely impaired chronic stroke population following subacute rehabilitation. The main hypothesis of the study is: Robot-assisted training has a superior effect on motor function (Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment; primary outcome), physical function, fatigue, and quality of life in moderately-to-severely impaired chronic stroke-affected individuals in comparison to standard training.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Jon Skovgaard Jensen, Ph.d.-student  ·  +4530127595  ·  jskovgaard@health.sdu.dk

Anders Holsgaard-Larsen, Professor  ·  AHLarsen@health.sdu.dk

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (2)

Rigshospitalet and Herlev Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen, DenmarkNot Yet Recruiting
Odense University HospitalOdense, DenmarkRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06273475