← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06193135 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Usefulness of Corifollitropin α as Alternative to Conventional Daily rFSH Protocols in Oocyte Donors Undergoing Pituitary Suppression With Medroxiprogesterona Acetate (MPA)

Condition: Infertility, Female · Reproductive Sterility  ·  Sponsor: Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA

PhaseNA
Planned participants318
Who can joinFemale, 18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

IVF patients frequently experience physical, emotional or physicological burden; this is particularly relevant in the case of oocyte donors, since young women undergo a procedure that is of no health benefit to them. One of the phases of the treatment that contributes most to this situation is ovarian stimulation; as it involves the administration of daily injections which, in addition to the discomfort of administration, causes anxiety to the patient about its correct administration and possible side effects and to physicians concerns about patient compliance. Advances in pharmacology and knowledge of ovarian pathophysiology have led to the development of new protocols that simplify and reduce drug administration, decrease the potential risk of misapplication and contribute to an improved patient experience. In this context, Corifollitropin α, a long-acting recombinant FSH (rFSH) molecule, provides with a single subcutaneous injection similar results as daily administration of rFSH during a week. On the other hand, conventional stimulation protocols used in ART resort to using a GnRH analogue (agonist or antagonist) to prevent early luteinization, which is defined as the presence of a progesterone value of \> 1.5 ng/ml on the day of induced ovulation. Nevertheless, its use presents some disadvantages, such as it being sometimes complex to achieve desensitization or consistent hypothalamic block, risk of OHS when ovulation is triggered with HCG or its cost. Hence the intere…

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

JUAN GILES, PhD  ·  +34 963.05.90.00  ·  juan.giles@ivirma.com

LAURA CARACENA  ·  +34687031978  ·  Laura.caracena@ivirma.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (2)

IVI ValenciaValencia, Valencia, SpainRecruiting
Ivi ValenciaValencia, Valencia, SpainRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06193135