← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06173115 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

Comparison of a Single Versus Double Perclose Technique for TAVR

Condition: Severe Aortic Stenosis  ·  Sponsor: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

PhaseNA
Planned participants876
Who can joinAll sexes, 65 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become widely recognized as a minimally invasive approach for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis. It has been proven to be a safe and effective option for patients who are at low, intermediate, and prohibitive risk for surgical valve replacement. One of the critical components of procedural success in a transfemoral approach is access site management, as vascular complications strongly correlate with adverse outcomes. When major vascular complications occur, there are higher rates of major bleeding, transfusions, and renal failure requiring dialysis, as well as a significantly higher rate of 30-day and 1-year mortality. In recent years, a "preclosure" technique has emerged as a common vascular closure approach using a Perclose Proglide system (Abbott Vascular), in which sutures are deployed before dilating the arterial access site. This allows for arterial closure after dilation to sizing up to larger bore access sheaths that accommodate valve delivery systems. The sutures are subsequently harvested and tightened to close the large bore arteriotomy site at the end of the case. It has been demonstrated that the use of two Perclose devices, or double Perclose closure, is an effective closure technique with a low rate of vascular complications. A large number of TAVR centers have adopted this method for large-bore vascular closure. In the past, there have been few investigations comparing the utiliz…

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

XianBao Liu, PhD  ·  13857173887  ·  liuxb@zju.edu.cn

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (25)

The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical CollegeBengbu, Anhui, ChinaRecruiting
Fujian Provincial HospitalFuzhou, Fujian, ChinaRecruiting
The First Hospital of Lanzhou UniversityLanzhou, Gansu, ChinaRecruiting
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaRecruiting
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaRecruiting
The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityZhanjiang, Guangdong, ChinaRecruiting
Yulin First People's HospitalYulin, Guangxi, ChinaRecruiting
Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshacun, Henan, ChinaRecruiting
Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular HospitalZhengzhou, Henan, ChinaRecruiting
Henan Provincial Chest HospitalZhengzhou, Henan, ChinaRecruiting
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha, Hunan, ChinaRecruiting
General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, PLAShenyang, Liaoning, ChinaRecruiting

+ 13 more locations — full list on the registry record.

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06173115