← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT06037356 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 28, 2026
● Recruiting

PUL vs TURP in BPH Patients With Urinary Retention

Condition: BPH With Urinary Obstruction  ·  Sponsor: Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

PhaseNA
Planned participants100
Who can joinMale, 40 Years to no upper limit
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

The study will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing prostatic urethral lift (PUL) versus transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) in benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients with urinary retention. The primary objective of this study is to compare the catheter-free rates of PUL vs TURP. Secondary objectives include comparison of complications rates, cost effectiveness, patient satisfactory, symptom scores, quality of life measures and urodynamic parameters.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Brian SH Ho, MBBS  ·  (852)2255-3023  ·  hobrian@hku.hk

Stacia Chun, BSc(Hons)  ·  (852)2255-4852  ·  stac@hku.hk

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Queen Mary HospitalHong Kong, ChinaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06037356