Condition: Pulmonary Edema Cardiac Cause · Sponsor: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
The study's primary aim is * to compare the effects of two different ventilation modalities, non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) and high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC), in the acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) setting, in terms of echocardiographic parameters of RV systolic and RV strain. * to determine the differences of the two interventions on other hemodynamic parameters echocardiographically assessed. * to assess the differences between the two interventions on physiological parameters, i.e., mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and on arterial blood gases (ABG) analysis parameters (i.e. relief of dyspnea and respiratory distress, patient comfort). Enrolled patients will receive NPPV and HFNC oxygen therapy in a randomized, cross-over fashion, for 40 minutes each (time 0, T0 and time 1, T1), followed by clinical and echocardiographic evaluation
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Tommaso Sanna · 00390630154187 · Tommaso.sanna@policlinicogemelli.it
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico Agostino Gemelli Roma | Roma, Italy | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05989139