← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT05959577 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Traditional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy vs Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy

Condition: Haemorrhoid  ·  Sponsor: National Taiwan University Hospital

PhaseNA
Planned participants200
Who can joinAll sexes, 25 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (the procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids, PPH) with anoplasty versus traditional Ferguson method for the treatment of patients with grade III /IV hemorrhoids.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

Jin-Tung LIANG, MD  ·  +886-972651432  ·  jintung@ntu.edu.tw

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Jin-Tung LIANGTaipei, TaiwanRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05959577