Condition: Rectal Neoplasms · Low Anterior Resection Syndrome · Anastomotic Leak · Sponsor: Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.
This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.
Jun Huang, MD · 13926451242 · huangj97@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.
| The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yatsen University | Guangzhou, Guangdong, China | Recruiting |
Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.
We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.
This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.
Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05943444