Fluid Responsiveness Prediction During Prone Position

Predicting fluid responsiveness is primordial when caring for patients with circulatory shock as it allows correction of preload-dependent low cardiac output states, while preserving patients of the deleterious effects of excessive fluid resuscitation. Patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with prone positioning (PP) are a specific subset of patients, as 1) they frequently present with shock; 2) excessive fluid administration may lead to respiratory worsening due to increased hydrostatic oedema with potential subsequent worse clinical outcome; and 3) all available dynamic tests evaluating fluid responsiveness can only be performed in patients in the supine condition (which in the case of severe ARDS patients in PP occurs only for 8h over 24h). These elements warrant the development of specific tests allowing the clinician to predict fluid responsiveness with enough exactitude when caring for these patients. We hypothesize that there exists diagnostic heterogeneity in the predictive performance of 4 clinical tests to identify fluid responsiveness in ARDS patients in PP. For the matter of this study, these 4 tests are the Trendelenburg maneuver, the end-expiratory occlusion test, the end-expiratory occlusion test associated with the end-inspiratory occlusion test, and the tidal volume challenge. The diagnostic reference of the study will be the relative change in cardiac index measured by transpulmonary thermodilution before and after a 500 m…

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Laurent BITKER, Dr  ·  4 26 10 94 93  ·  laurent.bitker@chu-lyon.fr

Mathieu Jozwiak, Dr  ·  4 92 03 55 10

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.