Patients Who Were Not Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes. Retrospective Study

There is extensive medical literature supporting the contribution of intensive care physicians to improvement of clinical outcomes in patients treated in an intensive care unit (1-3). There are many reasons for this contribution, including adherence to evidence-based medical protocols, as well as collaboration between different medical specialties in patient care (4-7). Over the years, several criteria have been formulated for the admission of patients to intensive care (8) according to their medical condition, but there are other factors that influence the decision whether to admit patients to intensive care, not necessarily medical ones, such as the availability of beds in the unit and the availability of medical and nursing staff. There are several studies that examined the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients who were not admitted to the intensive care unit, for medical or paramedical reasons (9). We would like to retrospectively examine all patients in the last 5 years who were presented for admission to general intensive care from various departments in our institution but were not admitted, to characterize the reasons why they were not admitted, the clinical characteristics of the patients and their clinical outcomes. Objectives: Main objective: To characterize the clinical outcomes of the patients who were presented for admission to general intensive care but were not admitted in the last 5 years. Secondary objectives: To characterize the reasons wh…

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Sara Dichtwald, Dr  ·  972-9-7472133  ·  sara.dichtwald@clalit.org.il

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.