← Eichor
Study identifier: NCT05798403 Synced from ClinicalTrials.gov · July 29, 2026
● Recruiting

Efficacy of Electroacupuncture Versus Solifenacin Succinate for Female Overactive Bladder

Condition: Overactive Bladder  ·  Sponsor: Yin Ping

PhaseNA
Planned participants204
Who can joinFemale, 18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteersNo

About this study

Through a scientific and standardized multicenter, blinding, double-dummy, randomized controlled, noninferiority clinical trial study method, the investigators evaluated electroacupuncture as a safe and effective non-pharmacological treatment for OAB in women by comparison with Solifenacin Succinate.

This description comes directly from the study's public registry record.

Talk to the study team

PING YIN  ·  0086-18917561621  ·  bingxue616@163.com

YUELAI CHEN  ·  0086-13020193726  ·  chenyuelai@163.com

Always discuss trial participation with your own doctor first.

Locations (1)

Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghai, Shanghai Municipality, ChinaRecruiting

Follow this study

Get one email when the public record changes — results posted, or the study's status changes. Nothing else, ever.

We email about this public record only. Unsubscribe anytime with one click. Never medical advice.

Is this your study? This page was generated automatically from the public registry record. Sponsors can claim it — free — to add branding and verified contact routing. Claim this page →

This page is independently generated by Eichor from the public ClinicalTrials.gov record and re-synced daily. It is not the sponsor's official website unless claimed. Nothing here is medical advice; eligibility is always determined by the study team — talk to your own doctor first.

Source record: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05798403